• Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives

in service of the
​common good

luther and the need for reform

6/11/2017

2 Comments

 

​The 500th anniversary of the commencement of the Reformation (31 October) has come and gone without much of a ripple.  The latest tweet from POTUS commands far more attention. Does that matter?
 
Well yes it does, let me say why.
 
Martin Luther and the Reformation bridge two enormously influential periods of history, benefiting from one (the Renaissance) and contributing to the emergence of the other (the Enlightenment).  Both periods have influenced and will continue to influence succeeding generations. 
 
The Renaissance (14th-16th centuries).  The Renaissance was a time for the re-flowering of the classics – art, literature and thought. The Latin phrase Ad Fontes (back to the sources), describes the underlying energy and motivation of the Renaissance – a greater understanding and appreciation of origins. Luther leaned heavily on this motivation and drew attention to it in the first of his five solas, sola scriptura – scripture alone, scripture being the ‘canon’ or authority of Christianity. He had many beefs with the institutional Church, but his primary concern was that the Church manipulated and abused people with ideas and practices that had no justification in the source – scripture. To hold and extort its wealth and power, the Church traded on the notion that people needed it and its sacramental practice to get to heaven. Luther asserted the scriptural verity that grace is not channelled through an institutional pipeline, but is a free gift that all can access.
 
Lubricated by the printing press, this was an explosive truth, that neutralised institutional power. The source, the bible, was made easily available – and in the vernacular.
 
Accessing sources is always important if people are to be able to live free and informed lives. Abusive situations are possible when people are kept in the dark. Power is maintained by keeping people in the dark. A feature of the digital age should be more light and less obfuscation.  That this is manifestly not the case may in part be paradoxically attributable to the second great period – the Enlightenment.  Let me come to that in a moment.
 
Luther’s influence spread well beyond theological halls and into the corridors of civil administration.  If Luther was only about indulgences, or whether he or Zwingli were more or less right about divine presence in the Eucharist, then the Reformation’s impact would be of only passing interest to those involved with the Protestant/Roman Catholic divide. But it was much more than this.  Luther taught that institutions, be they headed by the Pope or the Holy Roman Emperor, do not have the right to control the consciences and destinies of individuals. While people have responsibilities to one another and to civil authorities, they are answerable solely to God.
 
Following Luther, the overreaching power and influence of Pope and Emperor declined. While he cannot be directly blamed or praised for the rise of Europe’s nation states, there is no doubt his influence contributed to an environment in which a desire for nationhood as an empowerment of regional or local identity became an unstoppable phenomenon: one that Europe through its later colonialism inflicted (European national identity not indigenous local identity that is) upon peoples in Africa, Asia and the Pacific.
 
The Enlightenment (1685 -1815). The Enlightenment is strewn with many instantly recognisable names – Newton, Locke, Voltaire, Kant, Smith.... How is the age to be understood: the ‘age of reason’, or perhaps the ‘age of the individual’?   In 2017 is the age’s legacy bane or blessing? 
 
There can be no doubt that the Reformation hastened the age of the individual, an age formalised and entrenched by the Enlightenment. Luther emphasised the capacity of the individual to access the grace of God in Christ. ‘Personal salvation’ and its premier position in Protestant thought can hardly be doubted as any in my age profile can testify through memories of Billy Graham crusades, or a younger generation  familiar with the prosperity gospel served up in many or most mega churches today can also testify.
 
The great names of the Enlightenment have bequeathed an enormous legacy to humankind. But an unintended downside now needs correction.  Bane and blessing almost always travel together. I contend the Enlightenment and the Reformation have bequeathed a priority to individualism that is now in desperate need of correction.  Luther and many of Enlightenment thinkers would be aghast at the manner in which ‘individualism’ holds the world captive, stymieing desperately needed climate action, preventing legislation which would curb tax evasion, and negating policy which might reduce the escalating gap between rich and poor. An exaggerated individualism destroys the notion of common good.
 
The Enlightenment enabled the categorising and classification of knowledge. Disciplines developed that could be understood independently of one another. Little place was left for mystery or indeed for meta narrative. One individual’s account of fact or truth was to become of equal value to that of another.  Fairness in the media now assumes that space afforded one view should be provided in equal measure to a counter view, even when there is no legitimate counter view. The illegitimate is therefore legitimised. As mentioned earlier despite the availability of information 24/7 obfuscation rather than enlightenment predominates. Links between smoking and mortality are still open to question, universal vaccinations can be argued as an infringement of individual freedoms and climate change presented as a hoax or conspiracy.
 
As bizarre as these realities are, they have their origins in the negative side of the Enlightenment. But yet there is more! Social responsibility seeps out of every page of scripture. Yet amongst conservative Christians (politically and probably theologically), social action is nothing, personal piety and private morality is everything. 
 
The Anglican tradition, of which I am heir, holds to a number of verities. One of these is the concept of ‘Via Media’.  This does not mean some wishy washy middle way as some would interpret, no, it is a much more noble vision.   It is a commitment to valuing opposites, understanding that without the correction that an opposite brings a single proposition becomes a distortion.
 
Luther railed against an institutional monolith that valued individuals only as cogs in its vast self-serving enterprise.  However, asserting the rights of individuals as children of God is not to disassociate them from their belonging to each other in the family of God. In Christ the particular and universal are one.  The universal can only be properly understood through the particular (individual) and yet the value and identity of the individual is to be found in its relationship with the universal.
 
If Luther and the Reformation rescued the individual from the voracious appetite of medieval institutional power: today the Church must be in the forefront of rescuing common good from the voracious appetite of individuals and a philosophy of individualism that now  dominates both political and religious life.
 
 
2 Comments
John Bunyan
17/12/2017 10:07:52 pm

Luther railed also against the Jewish people and what he recommended was carried out on Kristellnacht, not surprisingly Luther's birthday, in 1938, his words of course quoted again and again with approval by the Nazis. He sowed terrible seeds of anti-Judaism that infected the half-pagan majority Lutheran Church in Nazi Germany (Bonhoeffer and those of the brave Confessing Church a smallish minority), Lutherans far more supportive of Hitler than Roman Catholics. But Christianity generally has been infected by terrible anti-Judaism for centuries, beginning in the New Testament writings themselves (and found in all kinds of places such as an article above which condemns in general the Pharisees, the group to which Jesus in fact was closest. It has to be admitted that it has contributed to anti-Judaism among Muslims today. I am pro-Jewish, trying to be a follower of those parts of the teachings of the rabbi Jesus that are applicable still. But I am anti-Zionist in the sense of deploring Israel's policies in the occupied territories. I especially admire those Jewish Israelis who in the spirit of the great Hebrew prophets also oppose them. Jesus himself was something of a Zionist, understandably so (and many Palestinian Muslims - and Christians - and indigenous Israeli Jews and Arabs - are largely descended from the ancient Jews, but his spirit I think would encourage us to see Jerusalem as a place of prayer for all peoples. And that even though its special significance is based on (1) David's capture of it from other peoples of the Land and making it his personal capital, (2) the Muslims later interpreting a vague story of Mohammed as referring to Jerusalem, and (3) what is historically and spiritually most significant to me, the execution of Jesus by the Romans with the support of the high priesthood (but not that of the Jewish people) in what is now part of the Old City, quite possibly on the site long occupied by the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

Reply
writing services reviews link
18/12/2017 03:24:57 am

Here in this article, you share the beautiful memory of the Martin Luther which is very famous personality. The sense of this information is looking so well and you convey the best information through this wonderful article. I love this information.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Subscribe


    ​Author

    ​Bishop George Browning. 
    ​Anglican Bishop of Canberra and Goulburn 1993 - 2008.

    ​Inaugural chair Anglican Communion Environment Network

    ​PhD Thesis: Sabbath and the Common Good: An Anglican response to the Environmental Crisis.

    D.Litt. Honoris Causa for contribution to Education

    Centenary Medal 2000 for Service to cmmunity

    ​Patron: Australia Palestine Advocacy Network

    Patron: Palestinian Christians in Australia

    Patron: Sabeel

    ARCHIVE

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    Publications

    Sabbath and the Common Good: Prospects for a New Humanity, Echo Books 2016

    ​Not Helpful: Tales from a truth teller, Echo Books 2021

    Links​

    Barbara May Foundation

    ​Australian Centre for Christianity and Culture

    Australia Palestine Advocacy Network

    ​Christians for an Ethical Society


Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives