• Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives

in service of the
​common good

Defiant Earth

23/5/2017

4 Comments

 
​Clive Hamilton’s latest book, Defiant Earth, the Fate of Humans in the Anthropocene, is a real challenge. He goes beyond science’s shocking revelation that we humans have set in motion irreversible change to planet earth; to ask what does it mean to be human in this profoundly changed situation. He even ventures into biblical reflection in saying, “Future historians of the cosmos will identify the century after World WarII and particularly the decades from 1990s when we knew what we were doing as the time of the Fall”. (p 126)
 
The Anthropocene is the term popularised in the year 2000 by the Nobel Prize winning atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen to describe the end of the Holocene, the last 100,000+ years of climate stability in which humans have flourished, and the commencement of a period of great volatility caused by the activity of one species – humans.   Clive graphically describes the situation by saying “human history and geological history have collided”. There is a rupture.  It is no longer appropriate to speak of ‘mother earth’ gently enfolding its human children, but rather to speak of earth systems fighting back.  The more powerful humans become the more powerful the forces of nature become in response. 
 
Clive is as critical of bland superficial responses as he is of those who deny the situation – the deniers. If policy and budgeting is any guide, the Australian government and of course the Queensland government must be in this category. While one can understand the raw politics of trying to shore up some seats in central Queensland, to do so by supporting the proposed Adani mine with so much at stake and even to consider ‘giving the coal away’ with a holiday from royalty revenue is as reprehensible as it is incomprehensible.
 
So what of a theological response? First, I agree with Clive in his preference for Irenaeus over Augustine in understanding “the Fall” as an ongoing, evolutionary understanding of the human predicament rather than a moment in pre-history when perfection turned sour. The first 11 chapters of the Bible do not describe moments of early time but illuminate our understanding of all time. Clive argues that while it might be fashionable to see humans as one amongst many species with a strikingly large percentage of shared DNA, the reality is that we humans are very different; we are the only species to wilfully and ubiquitously choose behaviour we know to be destructive.
 
To be human in this situation therefore demands informed lament, not about what is happening to us beyond our control, but about what we have done and wilfully continue to do, despite knowing the consequences of our actions.  Lament is not wallowing in self pity but a first step in reorientation. Even if we have set earths systems on a new and unpredictable path that does not mean stoic resignation, it does mean rising to a different standard, a standard which takes us beyond our consumer driven identity to a more intelligent and knowing place in this vast universe.  It takes us, as Clive says, into a new ethic.
 
I believe Clive is right to identify   ‘freedom’ as an appropriate place to begin an ethical and theological exploration of the human condition in this post Holocene, post Enlightenment period we have now entered.  The Enlightenment and outcomes flowing from the Industrial Revolution have cemented into western consciousness the idea that freedom resides with the individual and protecting individual rights is sacrosanct.  The French philosopher Paul Ricoeur railed against this proposition when he said: “if freedom means the right of the individual to do whatever they like, then I have to conclude that freedom is the root of all evil”.
 
Clive suggests that rather than residing with the individual, freedom resides in what we might call the natural order.  He does not say what he means by this, but let me have a shot at it.  Rather than being frustrated or even embarrassed by the primeval stories of creation in the light of modern science, I am continually drawn back to them.  The first creation story is the narrative of space creation. Light and darkness are separated. Land and water are separated. The water that is above (blessing and order) is separated from the water that is below (chaos). The three living spaces then team with life: the greater the space, the greater the freedom, the greater the freedom the greater the fecundity. On the other hand accumulation of rubbish, inappropriate human expansion, species extinction, violence, covetousness, greed and the like are all denials of space; in turn they are denials of life. Life requires freedom; space is the real custodian of freedom.  En masse we humans have developed the capacity to reverse creation’s order.
 
The post modern world denies us the option of a meta narrative.  Everyone has the right to state their own truth, to carve their own destiny. But is the post-modern world a confidence trick? The Anthropocene draws us back to a period before the Enlightenment, back to a meta story for while what we do as individuals remains important it is what we have done and do on mass that has brought us to this place. The Anthropocene demands a meta narrative to undergird an ethic for this age.  While we insist on the right of the individual or its logical progression, the rights of the individual nation, we will never be able to respond to our current predicament, for our predicament stretches beyond the individual and beyond the individual nation..
 
I want to suggest that the human vocation, the knowing, cognitive vocation, the ethical vocation, indeed the theological vocation, is to understand ourselves as keepers of the space in which freedom resides.  This is a very different concept to the prevailing metaphor of steward. This vocation will require characteristics which are not commonly lauded. Primarily we must understand we live within limits, boundaries; for without this understanding we will continue to fill all available space until freedom which undergirds life will be completely lost. It is right that we should be aspirational beings, but if we are to live in a world where freedom abounds, less must often be more. The great irony is that submitting to boundaries is not slavery but its opposite, the embracing of freedom, for freedom, which boundaries protect, resides beyond ourselves. This century, more than any other, humans have to learn the appropriateness of place and not live beyond it.  To illustrate the situation from another perspective, there are many definitions for beauty, but one that I like best is that beauty resides in the appropriate. We are in danger of living in an age of increasing ugliness.
 
The Noah narrative is a continuation of the creation narrative. It speaks of human activity becoming  so influential that it effects a change to earths patterns, creation is put into reverse, the waters cease to be separated, indeed there is no distinction between land and water, space is gone, freedom is gone, life is locked in an ark (coffin). It is hard to conceive a story more appropriate for our age.
 
At the conclusion of the 40 days creation normalises and the spaces return.  The passage concludes with the covenant between God and all living, signed with the bow in the sky. Into these spaces life tentatively steps out in freedom. In the anthropocene predicament, this covenant might sound too optimistic, for is God really going to intervene to prevent the consequences of our actions which are becoming so disturbingly apparent? If the passage were to have a literal interpretation the 40 days might be more like 400,000 years or much longer, when earth systems return to a life giving balance and earth continues without the human.
 
This is perhaps where the struggle to do theology in the age of the anthropocene hits the wall.  Is grace too optimistic? Is a Christian commitment to life that overcomes death, of light that banishes darkness far too hopeful?  Is the Christian doctrine of Salvation literally consigned to pie in the sky when we die? I would like to write much more about this and especially write a biblical eschatology that makes sense of the anthropocene. . My immediate answer is no, certainly not.  The Giver of space, the bestower of freedom will always call humans, those creatures uniquely dignified with the ‘knowledge of good and evil’, to be keepers of it, and in the keeping of it discover it for themselves – ‘thy kingdom come, on earth, as it is in heaven’.
4 Comments
David Hunter
23/5/2017 10:43:17 pm

I agree that we need a new narrative. We are responsible for what is happening in the world. There are so many of us now that if everyone acts selfishly, it will lead to disaster. We need to put limits on ourselves for the common good.

Reply
Wendy Flannery link
24/5/2017 06:03:21 pm

The whole article was a gift for me. Lately I've been reflecting myself on the fact that "the only species to wilfully and ubiquitously choose behaviour we know to be destructive." And the scientific solutions now being proposed and tested promise to be even more destructive. But I especially appreciate the teasing out of the faith perspective, going far beyond the feel good "care for mother earth" approaches that don't seem to get beyond very small and local "feel good" responses.

Reply
David
25/5/2017 10:53:51 pm

As a scientist, I could suggest that a 400,000 year Sabbath leading to the return of earth’s systems sans humans may in fact be optimistic. The last time global temperature reached 6 degree average global temperature (which is where we are heading – we have been warned about the 2 degree tipping point for very good reasons … because it is a tipping point) was around 250 million years ago when 95% of life was wiped out. The 5% remaining struggled back through sheer luck and on the chance probabilities of evolution. Next time the flip of the coin may lead to a planet like Mars. Is it really sensible putting that to the test?

Grace may not be too optimistic but it seems to need to work through each of us and our actions in the world. We desperately need to set those boundaries you talk about. As we all are rapidly finding out, the endless freedom of choice of lifestyles and consumer products is in fact a prison that can only be escaped when they are limited to a more appropriate number. It is indeed a paradox that freedom only comes when there are appropriate boundaries. As you have said the beauty resides in the appropriate. We desperately need leaders to set those boundaries because we seem incapable of doing it ourselves/myself. Our vote is in our hands and Grace is right there to connect with.

Yes indeed ‘thy kingdom come, on earth, as it is in heaven’. Maybe next time the Giver of space could choose another creature to have a go at being the 'keepers of the space in which freedom resides' because we seem to have had numerous repetitions of stuffing it up.

Reply
best essay writing service link
8/6/2017 12:53:53 am

The life of the human is in danger because the latest research is all doing for the destruction of the human. The atomic bomb is specially made for destroying of the human being. This book will be interesting and want to read it.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Subscribe


    ​Author

    ​Bishop George Browning. 
    ​Anglican Bishop of Canberra and Goulburn 1993 - 2008.

    ​Inaugural chair Anglican Communion Environment Network

    ​PhD Thesis: Sabbath and the Common Good: An Anglican response to the Environmental Crisis.

    D.Litt. Honoris Causa for contribution to Education

    Centenary Medal 2000 for Service to cmmunity

    ​Patron: Australia Palestine Advocacy Network

    Patron: Palestinian Christians in Australia

    Patron: Sabeel

    ARCHIVE

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    Publications

    Sabbath and the Common Good: Prospects for a New Humanity, Echo Books 2016

    ​Not Helpful: Tales from a truth teller, Echo Books 2021

    Links​

    Barbara May Foundation

    ​Australian Centre for Christianity and Culture

    Australia Palestine Advocacy Network

    ​Christians for an Ethical Society


Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives